Martin's Heinkel Heavy
Re: Martin's Heinkel Heavy
Finally got back to the modelling table tonight. I managed to cut the wings off, then added some spars, like so:
I then added some reinforcement to the front fuse joint and joined them:
Then, after the wing spars had dried, I joined the wing bits, leaving me here:
Regards
Martin
I then added some reinforcement to the front fuse joint and joined them:
Then, after the wing spars had dried, I joined the wing bits, leaving me here:
Regards
Martin
- fredk
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 6195
- Joined: May 1st, 2012, 6:25 am
- Location: Donaghadee, N'rn Ir'n
Re: Martin's Heinkel Heavy
Some serious modelling going on here
Al speling misteaks aer all mi own werk..
Its not just how good your painting is, its how good the touch-ups are too.
Its not just how good your painting is, its how good the touch-ups are too.
Re: Martin's Heinkel Heavy
David,dwomby wrote:That's looking great, Martin. Will it have undercarriage on the inner or outer nacelles (or both)?
David
I was thinking of just using the kit parts on the inner nacelles.
As the gear arrangement of the He177 could take more weight and the He377 was not stressed for dive bombing, it was not aas heavy as would first be thought and consequently the gear arrangement, as was, could be reused.
Regards
Martin
- DavidWomby
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 11765
- Joined: May 1st, 2011, 8:09 pm
- Location: Florida, USA
Re: Martin's Heinkel Heavy
Makes sense.
David
David
Re: Martin's Heinkel Heavy
So, after another couple of hours at the bench, the fuselage joints are all made and drying, and I've added an extended bomb bay roof and the kit bulkheads for rigidity. Fuse halves are now taped together to dry in the right orientation (one of the halves was a bit banana shaped originally, but that has been sorted out.
I've also cut out the bits for one lower wing and taped them together to check fit. Just need to sort out a radiator face and some bulkheads to prevent the see-through look and I could join the wing together. More soon.
Regards
Martin
I've also cut out the bits for one lower wing and taped them together to check fit. Just need to sort out a radiator face and some bulkheads to prevent the see-through look and I could join the wing together. More soon.
Regards
Martin
Martin R
"the 'R' stands for 'Representative'."
"the 'R' stands for 'Representative'."
- fredk
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 6195
- Joined: May 1st, 2012, 6:25 am
- Location: Donaghadee, N'rn Ir'n
Re: Martin's Heinkel Heavy
Impressive work
Al speling misteaks aer all mi own werk..
Its not just how good your painting is, its how good the touch-ups are too.
Its not just how good your painting is, its how good the touch-ups are too.
- TimJ
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 4290
- Joined: May 1st, 2011, 12:54 am
- Location: Oldbury, West Midlands
Re: Martin's Heinkel Heavy
Some serious work going on here. Great job so far.
2020 A:35 B:18. 2021 A: 51 B:25 C:21 2022 A:63 B:23 C:11 2024 A:9 B:4 C:15
Re: Martin's Heinkel Heavy
No pics, but progress continues.
I have lined the oil cooler intakes and various other orifices in the wing leading edges with plastic sheet to prevent the see-through look. This has all been primed; a lick of paint tonight and the wings can be assembled.
I have joined the spare outer wings with the intention of cutting them down to form tailplanes. That's plan A anyway. Not sure they'll look right.
I have extended the bomb bay aft of the wings by about 30mm and added a cut down piece of bomb bay roof between the fuse bulkheads for extra rigidity.
Finally, I have cut off the rear of the fuse aft of the tailplane roots and added a cut down version of the rear turret fairing from the Revell He177A-6 (you can still make a standard A-5 with the rest of the bits). This is a bit rough and ready but has had a coat of filler applied to make it a bit more symmetrical; that and some card shimming should make the halves line up better.
So, lots of minor progress but still lots to do, including adding some detail to the flight deck, which is next up. If I can get the fuse together and tailplane and wings ready for assembly by the end of the GB, I'll be happy.
Regards
Martin
I have lined the oil cooler intakes and various other orifices in the wing leading edges with plastic sheet to prevent the see-through look. This has all been primed; a lick of paint tonight and the wings can be assembled.
I have joined the spare outer wings with the intention of cutting them down to form tailplanes. That's plan A anyway. Not sure they'll look right.
I have extended the bomb bay aft of the wings by about 30mm and added a cut down piece of bomb bay roof between the fuse bulkheads for extra rigidity.
Finally, I have cut off the rear of the fuse aft of the tailplane roots and added a cut down version of the rear turret fairing from the Revell He177A-6 (you can still make a standard A-5 with the rest of the bits). This is a bit rough and ready but has had a coat of filler applied to make it a bit more symmetrical; that and some card shimming should make the halves line up better.
So, lots of minor progress but still lots to do, including adding some detail to the flight deck, which is next up. If I can get the fuse together and tailplane and wings ready for assembly by the end of the GB, I'll be happy.
Regards
Martin
Martin R
"the 'R' stands for 'Representative'."
"the 'R' stands for 'Representative'."
- splash
- Senior Service Rotorhead
- Posts: 13828
- Joined: May 1st, 2011, 11:02 am
- Location: Somerset England
Re: Martin's Heinkel Heavy
Excellent work, have you thought about what colours and markings you intend to use?
Will it be loaded for bear, with the four glide bombs and the full bomb bay?
Regards Splash
Will it be loaded for bear, with the four glide bombs and the full bomb bay?
Regards Splash
My work bench is starting to look like Portsmouth Naval Dockyard.
Re: Martin's Heinkel Heavy
Hi Splash,
I want it to look plausible and I can't get over that meaning RLM70/71 topsides, although I'm not too enamoured by that. As I'm assuming this size of aircraft would be tied to concrete runways, would a grey splinter be more appropriate?
Another thought: if this was a night bomber, some form of 75/76 scheme like a nachtjager with a black bottom, perhaps?
Re armament, I'm afraid the bomb bay will be closed and I'm not envisaging a maritime role for this strategic bomber.
I want it to look plausible and I can't get over that meaning RLM70/71 topsides, although I'm not too enamoured by that. As I'm assuming this size of aircraft would be tied to concrete runways, would a grey splinter be more appropriate?
Another thought: if this was a night bomber, some form of 75/76 scheme like a nachtjager with a black bottom, perhaps?
Re armament, I'm afraid the bomb bay will be closed and I'm not envisaging a maritime role for this strategic bomber.
Martin R
"the 'R' stands for 'Representative'."
"the 'R' stands for 'Representative'."
- Kitaholic
- Modelling Gent and Scholar
- Posts: 3765
- Joined: November 10th, 2014, 7:53 pm
- Location: 5 mins from SMW
Re: Martin's Heinkel Heavy
Nuclear role maybe?
Regards
Gord
Desperately trying to find his MOJO, don't know where I left it
Gord
Desperately trying to find his MOJO, don't know where I left it
Re: Martin's Heinkel Heavy
Hmmm. Anti-flash white underside.Kitaholic wrote:Nuclear role maybe?
Re: Martin's Heinkel Heavy
Wings glued together and drying:
Latest state of the fuselage. I have filled the holes left by removing the tailfin and the stubs for attaching the tailplane halves.
Steps towards making a new tailplane: glue together spare outer wing halves; make 2 parallel cuts at inboard and outer ends of the aileron and at 90degs to the aileron hinge line; remember that the tailplane will be fitted to the tapering rear fuselage (doh!); make another cut inboard to compensate; stand back and admire;try to replicate on other half!
I am happy with the planform and size of the tailplane and it goes well with the V-22 fin that Mark supplied, but its a bit thick. Will have to try to sand the cross section down a bit. It'll also have to have some spars added through the fuse to give the join some structural strength.
Regards
Martin
Latest state of the fuselage. I have filled the holes left by removing the tailfin and the stubs for attaching the tailplane halves.
Steps towards making a new tailplane: glue together spare outer wing halves; make 2 parallel cuts at inboard and outer ends of the aileron and at 90degs to the aileron hinge line; remember that the tailplane will be fitted to the tapering rear fuselage (doh!); make another cut inboard to compensate; stand back and admire;try to replicate on other half!
I am happy with the planform and size of the tailplane and it goes well with the V-22 fin that Mark supplied, but its a bit thick. Will have to try to sand the cross section down a bit. It'll also have to have some spars added through the fuse to give the join some structural strength.
Regards
Martin
Re: Martin's Heinkel Heavy
Great work MartinR,as regards colour,being a Wiffery,its entirely in your hands.Night bomber, maritime or even anti flash white,all are plausible.Have fun choosing.
Re: Martin's Heinkel Heavy
Thank you, Celt. I suspect it'll be quite some time before I have to make a choice!celt wrote:Great work MartinR,as regards colour,being a Wiffery,its entirely in your hands.Night bomber, maritime or even anti flash white,all are plausible.Have fun choosing.
However, I had a pleasant evening gizmoing up the cockpit.
Now for a little more work on the tailwheel bay and some painting and we must be getting close to joining the fuse halves.
Regards
Martin